If you’re not a sad act like me who lives in the minutiae of press releases, you may not know that when you’re going above 99mph in the new Cayenne Turbo, a little flap in the roof spoiler tilts by six degrees (and up to 19.9 degrees in sportier settings) to give the rear axle more stability. It can also act as an airbrake (y’know, like a Chiron or fighter jet) between 105mph and 167mph – extending to 28.2 degrees, again, to give the rear axle more stability. But this isn’t in a Chiron or fighter jet; it’s a big, fat, blobby SUV.
Porsche was very proud to announce this technology, stating the new Porsche Cayenne Turbo had broken new ground. Not literally (which is a genuine possibility considering it weighs 2.3 tonnes) but figuratively, being the first SUV to have moveable aero appendages, better known as ‘active aero’. More recently, it’s little Quasimodo brother – the smaller Cayenne Coupe – took this active aero thing to a whole ‘nother level. That gets the roof-mounted spoiler flap thing, as well as another spoiler. A bigger one. One that sits below the tailgate window and protrudes out by 135mm above 56mph.
I followed one down a road this week and as soon as that midriff spoiler did its baboon’s backside thing (not helped by being painted in Lava Orange) my bladder hit 100 degrees, instantly filling me with rage. Is it just me, or does increasing downforce and aerodynamics on a bluff-fronted, 2.3 tonne SUV seem utterly pointless? It’s a bit like chucking a deck chair off a cruise liner to save weight. Plus it looks utterly incongruous; making the already challenging Cayenne Coupe even harder for your eyes to swallow. And you’ve got to think about all the time, money and testing that they’ve done to engineer and execute this aero nonsense. And let’s be honest, how many Cayenne drivers are planning on hitting the anchors between 105 and 167mph? The speed limit in the UK is 70mph. And you barely top 50mph on your way to the shops, which is what most of these cars will do. And no one is taking them on a track day. If you are you need to have your head looked at. Seriously, if you want an aero car or to feel rear axle stability buy a race car. Or something from Porsche’s GT range.
Trying to make SUVs slippier and more downforce friendly is a stupid game. We all know that the best-looking SUVs are the ones that are designed with nothing but a set square or etch-a-sketch. Just look at the original Defender, G-Wagen, Bronco and Lambo LM002. And before you clap back saying ‘it’s better for the environment’, if you’re conscious about using more fuel to push your big breeze block on wheels through the air more efficiently, don’t spec the mirror cameras on your Audi e-tron to lower the drag co-efficient from 0.28 to 0.27, simply don’t buy an SUV. Especially if it has flappy, pointless, ridiculous active aero.
"stupid" - Google News
June 08, 2020 at 12:00PM
https://ift.tt/3cJyyQy
Change Our Mind #12: active aero on SUVs is stupid - Top Gear
"stupid" - Google News
https://ift.tt/3b2JB6q
https://ift.tt/3febf3M
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "Change Our Mind #12: active aero on SUVs is stupid - Top Gear"
Post a Comment